Skip to content
Habta

Fiscal Allocation Framework

FRM-003 version 1.0

Boggan waxaa turjumay mashiin. Xigashooyinka, qaabaynta, tixraacyada, koodhadhka iyo ereyada waxaa lagu ilaaliyay Ingiriisi, sida sax ah ee la daabacay. Bogga Ingiriisiga ah ayaa ah diiwaanka. Akhri bogga Ingiriisiga ah

FRM-003 Fiscal Allocation Framework

Version
1.0
Issued
August 21, 2026
Xaaladda
In force

In plain language

A plain-language summary of this document has not been published yet.

Version 1.0. Issued 21 August 2026. Status: adopted. Note: this framework is new at version 1.0 and was not in force during states 01 through 10. See GOV-001 section 6.

1. Why fiscal allocation is the hardest of the three dimensions

Money in American Deaf education moves through at least six separate channels, and no state publishes a consolidated view of them. A state school may hold a named line in an appropriations act while also drawing general formula funding, federal flow-through, and grant income. A district programme is funded through a special education formula that in most states does not disaggregate by disability category, which means the amount a state spends educating Deaf students in districts is not merely unpublished but in most states not calculated at any point by anyone. A regional cooperative may be funded by member assessment, by state grant, by fee for service, or by all three. And a voucher or education savings account programme moves public money to private providers under reporting rules that frequently do not record disability category at all.

The consequence is that a per-pupil figure for Deaf education is almost never available and almost never honest when it is offered. The framework below therefore captures the channels rather than attempting a total, and requires that any total be stated as a total of named channels rather than as the cost of Deaf education in the state.

2. Channels to establish in every state

Named appropriation. Whether each state school appears by name as a line in the state's appropriations act, the amount, the fiscal year, and the act citation. Where a school is funded inside a parent agency's budget rather than by name, that is recorded as the finding, because it determines whether the legislature ever votes on the school as such. Arkansas appropriates for its combined Deaf and blind school through a single act passed by the Joint Budget Committee, and the sequence of acts is traceable year by year.

General formula funding. Whether the state's general school funding formula reaches the state school and on what basis, including whether the school is treated as a local education agency for formula purposes and whether it generates weighted funding for its students.

Special education funding mechanism. The state's method for funding special education, identified by type, being census-based, weighted-pupil, cost-reimbursement, categorical block, or a hybrid, with the statutory citation. Whether any weight, category, or supplement attaches specifically to hearing impairment or to low-incidence disabilities generally. This is the determinant of whether a district has any fiscal incentive or disincentive attached to identifying and serving Deaf students, and it is a structural finding in its own right.

High-cost, low-incidence, or catastrophic aid. Whether the state operates a pool for high-cost placements, the threshold, the reimbursement rate, and whether residential placement at a state school or a private school draws on it.

Federal flow-through. IDEA Part B and Part C allocations to the state for the most recent published year, and where identifiable, any portion directed to Deaf-specific purposes. Federal deafblind project grant amount and cycle.

Interagency and tuition mechanisms. How money follows a student placed outside the resident district, including whether the resident district pays tuition to a state school, to another district, or to a private provider; who pays for residential care as distinct from education; and who pays for transportation. Where a state permits one district to serve another district's student, the Index establishes whether any statute allocates the cost or whether it is left to local contract. Florida turned out to have no regional programme statute at all, and its multi-district authority was a single permissive clause leaving cost allocation entirely to local agreement.

The market layer. Voucher, scholarship, and education savings account programmes through which a Deaf student may leave the public system. For each: statutory basis with the operative eligibility language quoted, the route available to a Deaf or hard-of-hearing child, whether a prior year of public enrollment or an individualised education programme is required, the award amount, participation by disability category if reported, which participating private schools serve Deaf students, and whether a participating student retains any entitlement under IDEA. Florida cannot say how many Deaf children have left its public system, because participation is not reported by disability category, and that was established across twenty-five named sources rather than asserted.

Capital. Major construction, renovation, or campus replacement affecting a state school, with the amount, the authorising instrument, and the schedule.

3. Rules

Figures are recorded as enacted or as appropriated, and the two are distinguished. The fiscal year is always stated and is never assumed to align with the school year. Amounts are recorded as published, without inflation adjustment, and any comparison across years states whether it is nominal.

No per-pupil figure is computed by the Index. Where a state or a school publishes one, it is quoted with its denominator and its source, and the denominator is checked against the enrollment instrument at FRM-002.

Where a fiscal figure exists only inside an unrenderable dashboard, it is recorded as a documented gap carrying the exact report and element identifiers needed for a later retrieval, in accordance with SRC-004.

4. Audit and oversight trail

The fiscal section of each state file also carries the oversight record, because the sharpest findings in the series have come from it. This includes state auditor and legislative audit reports touching the state school, the outreach unit, or the scholarship programmes; performance audits; and any repeated finding across audit cycles. Florida's file found a state auditor finding, repeated across at least four audit cycles spanning more than a decade, that staff at the state Deaf school did not meet the school's own American Sign Language proficiency requirement, with some employees more than fifteen years past deadline. Delaware's found a live federal civil rights complaint concerning over-referral to the state's Deaf school. The audit trail is checked in every state as a matter of course rather than when something prompts it.

The archive of superseded versions